California Attorney Client Privilege

There is a very good chance that you will be protected by the attorney-client privilege in California. This is a legal privilege that protects communications between the lawyer and the client. This privilege is established under California Evidence Code section 954 and is based on the United States v. Martin case. If you want to avoid any future problems, be sure to check with a qualified attorney before consulting with one.

In California, the privilege only protects the communication between the attorney and client.

The underlying facts are not protected. Independent facts related to communication are discoverable. Coy v. Superior Court (1962) held that independent documents prepared by the parties are not privileged. However, an attorney can observe evidence without removing it from the client. In certain cases, the lawyer may have to provide discovery about the facts involved.

Although the attorney-client privilege protects the content of communication, it does not protect underlying facts that are independent of the communication. In the case of an attorney, for example, an observation of a document or object made by the client is privileged. In addition, an attorney cannot exclude independent facts related to communication. For example, a witness statement prepared by the client is not privileged. Similarly, a document or object that is made by the attorney while on the client’s behalf is not privileged.

In addition, it is important to know that an attorney-client privilege does not protect information about a client that is related to a legal matter.

If the communication is related to a future crime or fraud, this information will not be protected. In most cases, a lawyer may need to disclose this information to prevent serious or financial injury. But the privilege does not protect a person’s own opinion or statement.

In California, the attorney-client privilege isn’t available in all cases. It can be waived by a single client if the attorney is issued on behalf of several clients in the same lawsuit. A recent 9th Circuit case, Anten v. Superior Court, involved an Indonesian real estate deal and Michael Schwab, the son of Charles Schwab. While the two men cultivated a relationship with the family of Muhammad Suharto, Anten failed to sue the law firm.

In California, the attorney-client privilege does not apply to information about an individual’s business.

It applies only to documents and objects that are a part of the lawyer-client relationship. A client can’t shield a document from the attorney. It is possible to violate the attorney-client privilege in other situations, such as a lawsuit involving a third party. When this happens, the client can’t afford to be protected.

The attorney-client privilege only protects the content of communications between the lawyer and the client. It does not apply to the facts that are not related to the communication. In Coy v. Superior Court, an attorney cannot protect a document if it is not prepared by the client. Therefore, a lawyer cannot claim to be privileged for an object unless the attorney can prove the existence of the document.

In California, the attorney-client privilege protects the communications between a lawyer and his or her client.

In addition to individuals, it extends to corporations. For instance, a corporation representative may obtain a statement from an employee who may be liable under the laws of his or her company. Regardless of the content, the statement is protected by the attorney-client privilege. It is important to note that, in many instances, an attorney has to have written authorization to use the attorney-client privilege.

In some instances, the attorney-client privilege is not applicable. If a third party, such as a lawyer’s boss, records the communication, the attorney-client privilege may not be applicable. It may even be possible to be a victim of a violation of the attorney-client privilege. In such a case, the lawyer should seek legal counsel and seek permission before disclosing the information. In such cases, the confidentiality of these communications can be violated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *